The financial world is facing profound change. The introduction of wCBDC is giving rise to new technological standards that can make payment transactions faster, more secure and more cost-efficient. The ECB is working hard on the tokenisation of central bank money. The question facing banks is: will they remain mere observers, or will they play an active role in shaping the future?
Key Takeaways
WCBDC could offer banks potential savings, efficiency gains and opportunities for innovation.
International projects are already demonstrating the relevance of this technology.
Banks risk missing out on key market opportunities if they do not actively participate in its development.
Wholesale Central Bank Digital Currency (wCBDC) could revolutionise international payments. Why is it crucial for banks in particular to have a say in its development? What technologies underpin it, and what global developments could set the tone?
Why banks need to act now
ECB's wCBDC: A look at Pontes and Appia
The European Central Bank is relying on the Pontes and Appia platforms for the development of wCBDC, which will use distributed ledger technologies (DLT) to process interbank transactions. Pontes serves as a test bed to find out how central bank money can be used efficiently and securely in tokenised form – Appia is intended to be the long-term solution.
What was tested?
In previous test phases, the ECB analysed how financial instruments can be tokenised and transferred interoperably between market participants. Particular attention was paid to cybersecurity and adaptation to existing financial systems.
Technical details about Pontes and Appia
My article in IT-Finanzmagazin provides a detailed look at how these platforms work technically: How the ECB wants to tokenise central bank money (German).
Global initiatives: The international market situation
wCBDC is no longer just a hot topic in Europe. Central banks and other institutions around the world are experimenting with similar technologies:
- Swiss National Bank (SNB) – Project Helvetia: This project is testing the settlement of interbank transactions on a DLT platform.
- Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) – Project Ubin: The focus here is on cross-border payments.
- South African Reserve Bank (SARB) – Project Khokha: SARB uses DLT to process domestic payments.
- Bank for International Settlements (BIS): The BIS is driving global innovation, including projects such as mBridge (CBDC linking), Mariana (smart contract automation) and Agora (blockchain in global trade).
The opportunity to realise efficiency gains
One key advantage of wCBDC is efficiency. International payments using traditional infrastructure often incur high costs and delays due to correspondent banks. With wCBDC, however, transactions can be settled directly between the parties – without expensive intermediaries.
But the practical benefits go beyond cost reduction. Thanks to 24/7 processing on a DLT platform, banks can make payment flows more flexible and thus manage liquidity more efficiently. This is not only an advantage for the bank itself, but also for business customers, who can be offered more innovative services.
Furthermore, the DLT-based infrastructure opens doors for entirely new business models. The use of smart contracts – i.e. automated contracts – on the blockchain enables, for example, automated payment contracts or the trading of tokenised goods. This offers considerable growth opportunities both in the interbank market and in areas such as trade finance and capital market transactions.
What happens if banks don't participate?
Of course, there are also risks. Banks that actively participate in the design of a wCBDC must make technological investments and accept regulatory uncertainties. The governance of such platforms, such as who decides on their use and access, is also still open.
Nevertheless, the price of inaction could be much higher. Banks that ignore the change run the risk of losing market share to more flexible competitors. Correspondent banks could be marginalised in their role in the long term due to declining demand for their services.
However, the greatest dangers lie in strategic positioning. A wCBDC is coming – the question is not if, but when and to what extent. Financial institutions that are not active now could quickly fall behind and remain without influence in a preferential system.
Conclusion: Why banks should take action
The strategic value of wCBDCs lies not only in their technological capabilities, but also in the opportunity they offer to influence the future of international payments. Banks that are involved at an early stage will not only secure competitive advantages, but will also be able to help shape the future rather than simply reacting to it.
The development and use of wCBDCs offer the opportunity to reduce costs, optimise liquidity and establish innovative business models. But with every further delay, banks risk missing out on key market opportunities. It is worth taking action now – before developments pass them by.
Authors
